Form follows function in evidence-based public policy: the pragmatic alternative to the positivist orthodoxy
Abstract
References
Bacon M (2012). Pragmatism, an introduction. Polity, Cambridge, UK
Bryman A (1984). The Debate about Quantitative and Qualitative Research: A Question of Method or Epistemology?
The British Journal of Sociology 35(1): 75-92
Caldwell B (1994). Beyond Positivism. Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. Routledge, New York, US
Cochran M (2002). Deweyan Pragmatism and Post-Positivist Social Science in IR. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 31(1): 525
Comte A (2009). A General View of Positivism. Cambridge University Press, New York, US
Comte A (2012). System of Positive Polity. Forgotten Books, London
Creswell J (2015). A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Sage Publications, London, UK
Descartes R (1993). Meditations on the first philosophy. Third edition. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, US
Descartes R (1956). Discourse on Method. Pearson, New York, US
Dewey J (1985). The Middle Works of John Dewey 1899-1924, Volume 12. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, US
Dewey J (2008). The Later Works of John Dewey 1925-1953, Volume 4. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, US
Dicker G (1998). Hume’s Epistemology and Metaphysics: an introduction. Routledge, New York, US
Felizer M (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4(1): 6-16.
Fogelin R (1993). Hume’s Scepticism. In: Norton D (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 90-116
Friedman M (1953). The Methodology of Positive Economics in Essays on Positive Economics. Chicago University Press, Chicago, US, pp 3-46.
Friedrichs J, Kratochwil F (2009). On acting and Knowing: how pragmatism can advance International Relations research and methodology. International Organization. 63(): 701-731
Garcés P (2016a).
Neither “Mind” nor “Things” but Acting: Some Philosophical Implications of Pragmatism for International Relations Inquiry. Analecta Política 6(11): 227-248.
Garcés P (2016b). Beyond Positivism: Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Pragmatist Research. Revista PUCE 103: 439-459
Hands D (2004). Pragmatism, knowledge and Economic Science, Deweyan pragmatic philosophy and contemporary economic methodology. In: Khalil E (ed.) Dewey, Pragmatism, and Economic Methodology. Routledge, New York, US, pp 255-270
Head B (2008). Three Lenses of Evidence-Based Policy. The Australian Journal of Public Administration 67(1): 1-11
Hildebran D (2008). Dewey: a beginner’s guide. Oneworld Publications, Oxford, UK
Hollis M (1994). The Philosophy of Social Science: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Jackson P (2011). The Conduct of inquiry in International Relations, philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Routledge, New York, US
James W (1904). The Pragmatic Method. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 1(25): 673-687.
Johnson B, Onwuegbuzie A (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher 33(7): 14-26
Johnson R, Onwuegbuzie, A, Turner, L (2007). Towards a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1(2): 112-133
Kaboub F (2008). Positivist Paradigm. In: Leong F (ed.). Encyclopedia of Counseling. Sage. London, UK, pp 785
Khalil, Elias. 2004. John Dewey, the transactional view and the behavioral sciences. In: Khalil E (ed.) Dewey, Pragmatism, and Economic Methodology. Routledge, New York, US, pp 1-12
Kratochwil F (2011). Ten points to ponder about Pragmatism. In: Bauer H, Brighi E (eds). Pragmatism in International Relations. Routledge, New York, US, pp 11-25
Levi I (2004). Corrigibilism without solidarity. In: Khalil E (ed.) Dewey, Pragmatism, and Economic Methodology. Routledge, New York, US, pp 240-251
Morgan D (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1(1): 48-76.
Noor K (2008). Case Study: A Strategic Research Methodology. American Journal of Applied Sciences 5(11): 1602-1604
Pawson R (2002). Evidence-based Policy: In Search of a Method. Evaluation 8(2): 157-181
Peirce C (1905). What Pragmatism is. The Monist 15(2): 161-181
Putnam H (2002). The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and other essays. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, US
Quine W (1951). Main trends in recent philosophy: Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60(1): 20-43
Quinton A (2010). Inquiry, thought and action: John Dewey’s theory of knowledge.” Pp: 1-11, in R.S. Peters (ed.) John Dewey Reconsidered. New York, US: Routledge
Rosenberg A (1993). Hume and the philosophy of science. In: Norton D (ed). The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press, New York, US, pp 64-89
Rosenthal S (2004). Pragmatic naturalism, knowing the world, and the issue of foundations, beyond the modernist – postmodernist alternative. In: Khalil E (ed.) Dewey, Pragmatism, and Economic Methodology. Routledge, New York, US, pp 153-164
Sanderson I (2002). Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence-based Policy Making. Public Administration 80(1): 1-22
Solesbury W (2002). The ascendancy of evidence. Planning Theory and Practice 3(1): 90-96
Smith J (2004). Dewey on inquiry and language. In: Khalil E (ed.) Dewey, Pragmatism, and Economic Methodology. Routledge, New York, US, pp. 133-152
Suppe F (1977). Afterword. In: Suppe F (ed). The Structure of Scientific Theories. Second Edition. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, US
Talisse R, Aikin S (2011). Introduction. In: Talisse R, Aikin S (eds.) The Pragmatism Reader. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, US, pp 4-11
Uebel T (2014). Logical Empiricism. In: Curd M, Psillos S (eds). The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. Second Edition. Routledge, New York, US, Pp. 90-103
Varone F, Rihoux B, Marx A (2006). A New Method for Policy Evaluation? Longstanding Challenges and the Possibilities of
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). In: Rihoux B, Grimm H (eds). Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis: Beyond the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. Springer, New York, US, pp 213-236
Waugh J, Ariew R (2008). The History of philosophy and the philosophy of science. In: Curd, M, Psillos S (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. Second Edition, Routledge New York, US, pp 27-38
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.310
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.